Join Bridge Winners

Bridge Winners Profile for Geoff Hampson

Geoff Hampson
Geoff Hampson
  • 35
    Following
  • 425
    Followers
  • 3
    Posts
  • 1
    Favorites

Basic Information

Member Since
June 27, 2010
Last Seen
Aug. 16
Member Type
Bridge Pro
about me

I have been a full-time pro for about 15 years. I can't think of any better way to make a living.

Bridge Information

Favorite Bridge Memory
Rosenblum 2010
Bridge Accomplishments
Many and varied
Regular Bridge Partners
Greco, Rodwell, Jacobus, Meckstroth, Cheek, Grue, Gitelman, Levin
Member of Bridge Club(s)
BBO
Favorite Tournaments
NABC's world championships, cavendish Calcutta
Favorite Conventions
Rkcb
BBO Username
Ghampson
ACBL Ranking
Grand Life Master
Sorry, this user has no cards yet.
ATB -620 instead of +620
100% to both players. each has a clear 4S bid at the obvious time.
Lose the Trials Semifinal with Me, V
Eric was the 4NT bidder. Aaron has the agreement correct. Even if we treated that 4NT as RKCB we probably wouldn't cater to that when the 4NT bidder is a PH, way more useful to have a way to show the minors there (which is what we play by ...
ROSENTHAL is Mixed USA2
Very well done!
Outraged by the USBF
where was this voice when the subject was actually being debated publicly on this site?
Update -- Grue and Levin Win Blue Ribbon Pairs
Perhaps the committee thing should be in a separate thread?
Multon and Willard Win Mixed Pairs
meh
#saynotocheats
It is shameful to think that they have support from any sector of the population let alone any experts. This crime is unforgivable! Their ban should only be lifted many years after a complete confession.
Who Will Direct the Directors?
I play a similar system and can totally understand the reason for rebidding 1 with the given hand when playing it 4+, forcing and possibly a canape. 2m is limited and denies a 4+M ...His hand was almost too strong for a NF 2m bid but not strong ...
Who Will Direct the Directors?
Kit; (and Steve) When there is a possible defense that succeeds but that defense becomes impossible with the information given then I would allow the defense to prevail 100% of the time. What do I mean by possible? If you would never consider the winning D then I would call ...
Who Will Direct the Directors?
I think David may be right... The laws should be changed to treat situations like this differently. When the information given makes the winning defense impossible, but a successful defense is possible with the accurate information (so at least 1 of the polled players found the winning defense given the ...
.

Bottom Home Top