Join Bridge Winners

Bridge Winners Profile for Helene Thygesen

Helene Thygesen
Helene Thygesen
  • 46
    Following
  • 16
    Followers
  • 0
    Posts
  • 0
    Favorites

Basic Information

Member Since
Sept. 6, 2011
Last Seen
Feb. 18
Member Type
Bridge Player
Country
Netherlands

Bridge Information

Favorite Bridge Memory
"No, my queen won over your king, this is a feminist bridge club, you know!"
Bridge Accomplishments
Played 1st division fylde league teams, one 1st and one 2nd place at Blackpool congresses
Regular Bridge Partners
Fred Kreek, Malgorzata Hirsz, Inge Okkes
Member of Bridge Club(s)
Harrogate, AMC, IJburg
Favorite Tournaments
Tolani Grand Prix (Mumbai), EBL Women's Festival, Pula Festival
Favorite Conventions
T-Walsh, K2, NLM, Cheap Transfers, transfer freedbids, Rumpensohl, Vinje signals, Coded Minors
BBO Username
helene_t
ACBL Ranking
None
Sorry, this user has no cards yet.
What has partner got?
4 must be an error. If he was aware what 3 means, he would never bid 4. The way to show a super hearts fit is 4. He isn't going to confuse us even if he found he has six spades and/or 28 points ...
What is a ‘convention’?
Well, it should be, of course, it's just my impression that most people consider take-out doubles to be "natural". No particular logic to it.
What is a ‘convention’?
In practice, it is often used somewhere between the two options given in the poll, with some natural or quasi-natural agreements called "conventions" if they are non-standard, whatever that means. But the word "artificial" is often used the same way. So therefore I think it's reasonable to say it ...
Need help defending against Precision 1!D
A direct 2 as natural is ok. You can probably live without Michaels. The problem is if you can live without an unassuming cuebid. If you like transfer responses to overcalls, after (1)-1 you could play 1NT: natural, could have a 6 clubs or a modest ...
Is 2!H forcing?
Without the 2 bid, 2 would be NF since you play XYZ so invitational hands go through 2. After the intervention, 2 is weak. 3 is any GF, and some invitational hands could double. 3 is 5-5 and could be played as either invitational ...
Han Peters's bidding problem: 742 K652 AQ AQJ5
Partner would have shown K but could presumably still have K. Otherwise maybe he has a void in spades. I am gambling on that and bidding 6.
Gonzalo Goded's bidding problem: QJ4 AK6 A653 K73
Looks like he should just have bid 4 instead of torturing us. Edit: sorry, I somehow thought it had 7 spades. I suppose the bidding is OK, then.
Gonzalo Goded's bidding problem: QJ4 AK6 A653 K73
Kxxxxx and out. Or some such.
Gonzalo Goded's bidding problem: QJ4 AK6 A653 K73
We probably have some way to show a weak hand with spades immediately, so maybe this should be a hand that would have penalized 3. Without discussion, though, it sounds like a weak bid. Partner could have doubled 2NT, or bid one of opps suit either then or now ...
Forcing pass situation or not?
The auction suggests that we don't have a fit and there is no reason to think we can make 2NT. I think defending 2 undoubled should be an option.
.

Bottom Home Top