Join Bridge Winners

Bridge Winners Profile for Jeroen Wieland

Jeroen Wieland
Jeroen Wieland
  • 51
    Following
  • 7
    Followers
  • 26
    Posts
  • 0
    Favorites

Basic Information

Member Since
Feb. 19, 2013
Last Seen
7 hours ago
Member Type
Bridge Player

Bridge Information

ACBL Ranking
None
Sorry, this user has no cards yet.
Is this the correct ruling?
"There is no further penalty for the same player" Indeed, there is not, but 64C still applies as it deals with restoring equity and not with penalties.
Is this the correct ruling?
"The only thing that has to be watched out for is it is technically illegal to intentionally revoke if, say, you revoke once, notice it, and no revoke again intentionally to save a trump and now get equity instead of facing a penalty." 64C will be applied for the 2nd ...
Was this the correct ruling?
"Not if it's on the CC." Also if it's on the CC. North knows that either (or both) the non-alert was wrong, or the content on the cc was wrong. There is no reason to assume that info from the CC trumps info from a (non)-alert when ...
Two way finesse.
the imps would be weighted, so the non-linearity of the IMP scale does not matter
Jeroen Wieland's bidding problem: K4 J32 KQ9 T7543
I should have mentioned that 3 was non-constructive
Jeroen Wieland's bidding problem: QT82 9754 A4 QT3
(15)16-18 balanced
Oren Kriegel's bidding problem: AJ72 743 82 QT52
I doubt that any lead by partner would be correct
Ethical or not?
the three options are not mutually exclusive
ATB -640
As south (with another hand), I really like the availability of an SOS XX if the opps will always take out my XX
Jeroen Wieland's bidding problem: 42 AQ753 AJ92 A9
no
.

Bottom Home Top