Join Bridge Winners

Bridge Winners Profile for John McWhinnie

John McWhinnie
John McWhinnie
  • 4
    Following
  • 1
    Followers
  • 36
    Posts
  • 0
    Favorites

Basic Information

Member Since
March 29, 2011
Last Seen
2 hours ago
Member Type
Bridge Player
Country
Canada

Bridge Information

BBO Username
jmcw
ACBL Ranking
Ruby Life Master
Sorry, this user has no cards yet.
Illegal 1NT
Then, does it follow the if the hand was K4 J Q98753 KQ54 it would be legal and considered a psyche
Help needed with a player upset with a director's ruling
Norths pass is clear evidence that Souths hand type was stronger than expected.
Help needed with a player upset with a director's ruling
Actually it seems that you have to define weak the way the director sees it. And that is just wrong
Help needed with a player upset with a director's ruling
Presumably the director would penalize at least 11 pairs, warn 4 and apply a slow play penalty to the abstentions
Help needed with a player upset with a director's ruling
Nigel: I think a hand that has 1 defensive trick and virtually no prospects for a second can be reasonably described as weak. A hand that has 7 HCP is close enough to be described as weak. This thread suggests that many would consider the hand weak. I am not ...
Help needed with a player upset with a director's ruling
To those who think South's hand is not "weak". What bid would you suggest he should make? AND if you suggest a "cue" to show limit or better then would not East be likely to call the Director to complain that South is overstating his values?
Help needed with a player upset with a director's ruling
Strongly disagree with this, but I would consider penalizing the director.
Help needed with a player upset with a director's ruling
xxxxakxxxxxxx this is a weak 2 where I play
Help needed with a player upset with a director's ruling
These stupid rules/laws need to change. What other game/sport nitpicks a players judgement and then penalizes based on a 1 or 2 hcp "deviation". Imo south hand is weak from a defensive point of view, but is not weak offensively. In this situation 3 is arguably the ...
Comparable call
So can we agree that the 1 bidder can bid any thing he wants? But unless it is a comparable call to a 1 opening bid, partner is barred.
.

Bottom Home Top