Bridge Winners Profile for Jonathan Mestel
Basic Information
- Member Since
- Oct. 8, 2015
- Last Seen
- May 26
- Member Type
- Bridge Player
- about me
The picture lies - I have no hair or snakes any more.
Bridge Information
- ACBL Ranking
- None
Sorry, this user has no cards yet.
- procedural penalty
- In some games, no quarter is given.
- Honolulu BRP 7NT Lead Discussion
- There is a practical point which many above do not seem to have considered. When RHO bids what you expect to be the final contract and the tray comes under the screen, if you and screenmate pass, the tray goes back and the other two, INCLUDING RHO, will pick up ...
- Down Under Coup
- Brace ourselves? I fear I'd need bridge work, but then I'm long in the tooth.
- You hold: !S87 !HAQ !DJ873 !CJ8432
- If I'd know he thought that was a 3♦ bid I'd have doubled too. Grossly lucky majors.
- You hold: !S87 !HAQ !DJ873 !CJ8432
- Actually, it looks like my -380 for 2Dx+1 could be worth quite a few matchpoints. RHO expects to be doubled in 3♦ yet bid it anyway. I am surprised so many people double - whom are you playing against? I think 2♦ was more likely to go down ...
- You hold: !S87 !HAQ !DJ873 !CJ8432
- I would sometimes pass 2♦x. Since I have the UI from the future auction that this would be wrong, I'd better do it....!?!?
- Dirty Talk
- I suppose it comes down to whether exasperation that oppo have been lucky again counts as "a demonstrable bridge reason." Do you believe declarer should always be allowed to make the contract after this silly remark by South, however he plays and however the cards lie?
- Dirty Talk
- Unless South had ♦A up his sleeve and clubs were running. North has some sort of guess, and so does declarer,
- Dirty Talk
- Obviously S should have kept his mouth shut, whether he held ♣Q or not. But I suspect he was annoyed by his partner's strange decision to play a 2nd spade, removing a likely losing option. "You need something else as well!?" would be an appropriate reaction, though one best ...
- Michael Rosenberg's bidding problem: 9 8 AK52 KJ97542
- Interesting. I think 4♣ is clear, and also best played forcing. We can still play 4NT, 5♣, 6♣. Are we really going to make precisely 9 tricks in NT? I would also bid 4♣ over a slow 3NT, but it seems from the majority view I ...
See all comments
