Join Bridge Winners

Bridge Winners Profile for Jonathan Weinstein

Jonathan Weinstein
Jonathan Weinstein
  • 5
  • 29
  • 27
  • 12

Basic Information

Member Since
Aug. 4, 2010
Last Seen
Sept. 24
Member Type
Bridge Player

Bridge Information

Bridge Accomplishments
semis of USBC 2010; 2nd in imp pairs 2007, NAP-A 2009
BBO Username
ACBL Ranking
Gold Life Master
Sorry, this user has no cards yet.
Frivolous Appeal Penalty VOTE
I would approve the sentence with the addition of a cap to the penalty at something reasonable. Not that I expect commitees to go crazy, but some parameters should be codified.
Jonathan Weinstein's bidding problem: AJT5 73 Q JT8652
I love that I thought I was through making decisions on this hand after bidding 2NT, and here I can see five reasonable calls at the next turn.
Jonathan Weinstein's bidding problem: AJT5 73 Q JT8652
There is a decent chance that you'll be happier in 3 or 4, or even 4, than 3NT.
Jonathan Weinstein's bidding problem: AJT5 73 Q JT8652
Right! I thought it was less than clear that 3NT is the best choice (although I did bid it at the table.)
Ban Collusive Cheaters For Life
Chris, Thanks for laying this out so clearly, especially the false analogy to criminal justice, and bridge as a privilege rather than a right. I agree completely about this. If I remember right, you pointed out a few years ago that the analogy is poor when it comes to burden ...
Missing Aces and Micro-Moysians
That was assuming hearts 8-1. I would also worry about hearts being 7-2. Then you would need East to have spade KQ and read the position.
Missing Aces and Micro-Moysians
On the first hand, I don’t think you need East to have KQ of spades. Run all the trumps keeping 1 spade and 3 clubs in dummy. If he keeps 3 clubs, cash A and duck a club. Otherwise duck a club. The J is a red herring.
Road to the GNT Final Four, R8 Q4
The club combination on the second board is pretty cool… I don’t have time to write it up today but maybe someone will.
Report on Vote on Tie-breaking & follow up vote
Eric, this is the same as a .5-imp carryover from the round robin. Does it make it more palatable to put it that way? The Bermuda Bowl has had much more substantial carryovers in many iterations of their CoC, so I would think a .5-imp carryover is reasonable.
Road to the GNT Final Four R8 Q2
On #28, 7NT is a small bit better than 7 because you can always test the diamonds while you still have a club entry (though it has a losing case also, when South has a small stiff diamond and at most 2 trumps.) If partner had xx or x ...

Bottom Home Top