Join Bridge Winners

Bridge Winners Profile for Nick Krnjevic

Nick Krnjevic
Nick Krnjevic
  • 2
  • 13
  • 2
  • 9

Basic Information

Member Since
Jan. 23, 2011
Last Seen
2 hours ago
Member Type
bridge player

Bridge Information

ACBL Ranking
Sorry, this user has no cards yet.
Some words from Monaco
George- I'd be surprised if PZ withdrew because he wants to compete for Switzerland. PZ plays, and pays, to win. Winning requires team-mates who are crushers. Monaco - which Somerset Maugham famously described as a sunny place for shady people- has very lax rules re acquiring residency/citizenship. So, as ...
In the middle of a tournament, a player collapses. Do you know what to do?
Cornelia -you hit the nail on the head. Whatever happened to "Do unto others..... "
Another Reese-Schapiro Hand
Bernard Levin's memorable line about Lord Longford's campaign for prison reform seems apt: Everybody asks the wrong question about Avon, viz., is he a zealot? The question is not worth asking: of course he is a zealot. What we should be discussing is something quite different: is he ...
The Godfather of Bridge
Cameron- I cheerfully agree with all that you wrote ....except the third sentence. Avon will *not* stop writing if people stop reading and caring. Much to his credit, Avon will write *more*.
Another Reese-Schapiro Hand
Mike -sounds like Stayman was a disciple of Leona Helmsley: only the "little people" have to follow the rules.....
Another 8 ever, 9 never
If E had 10x, QT or Qx of clubs would he not have upper cut the 3rd round of hearts,catering to West's QJ or Jx? So E either has xx of clubs or a 3 card holding. Finesse loses to W's stiff Q or QT but wins ...
GNT D. 22 GNT Fiasco. The official ruling
Different jurisdictions different rules - civilian regimes like their judges to explain why they toss out the evidence of the majority of the witnesses, particularly when preferring the evidence of a party who has skin in the game over that of a neutral party.
GNT D. 22 GNT Fiasco. The official ruling
Equal time in this case meant 2 lines plus identification, which was important since Team C did not have a dog in this fight. And the justices would certainly have let you go if your draft ruling had omitted to explain why you rejected the evidence of the majority of ...
GNT D. 22 GNT Fiasco. The official ruling
Ray- I think there’s a spectrum. I agree with you that the District didn’t have to provide a detailed summary of what each witness said. But if you’re going to briefly summarize and accept the fact version of one of the three teams in the final, fairness ...
GNT D. 22 GNT Fiasco. The official ruling
The District states that there are "4 separate issues": "1. DIC behavior and performance 2. Conditions of Contest (COC) 3. Suggested improper player behavior 4. Actual IMP differentials in the three matches and the resulting VPs" The District then states that the first three issues are irrelevant to its ruling ...

Bottom Home Top