Bridge Winners Profile for Patrick Gaudart
Basic Information
- Member Since
- May 11, 2018
- Last Seen
- 5 hours ago
- Member Type
- Bridge Player
- Country
- United Kingdom
Bridge Information
- ACBL Ranking
- None
Sorry, this user has no cards yet.
- Opening 1 NT point range on convention card
- Surely if in a partnership this hand must be opened 1NT, then they have an agreement to do so. Therefore, it should be marked 11+ to 14 on their card as a result?
- Bidding Deep Finesse
- I guess it depends how much 1♦ promises. 1♦ - (1♠) - 2♠* - (3♠); 4♣ - 5♣ Seems reasonable if it usually shows 5. Maybe south would bid 4♠ though? (Instead of 4♣) If West competes to 4♠ instead of 3♠, then ...
- 18-19 HCP for 2NT rebid - why?
- It gets even more complicated if you're playing a mini NT. In that situation it's probably best to use a system like the one Jim mentioned: splitting the ranges between 1♣ and 1♦ openers
- ATB
- If 1♥ is the partnership style then I think East is to blame as 2♥ is surely safer than 2♠.
- Patrick Gaudart's bidding problem: QT864 T4 KJ87 82
- Sorry all, put in the bids wrong (oops) Have corrected now
- Patrick Gaudart's bidding problem: AKQJ9876 Q J2 94
- Sorry I put the suits in wrong ... I will post again with the correct hand
- Liam Milne's bidding problem: A AK7 AT93 T7432
- if partner responds 4♥, I'll pass
- David J Waterman's bidding problem: K92 K6 AJ87 K765
- did you have an agreement or understanding of what partner's X was?
- Patrick Gaudart's bidding problem: KJxx 8xxxx KQ Ax
- Yes - my main interest with this question is whether or not people would treat KQ as good enough. The other questions are also interesting - I think the lack of good rebid means 1H wouldn't be great and I don't play flannery.
- Torsten Ertbjerg Rasmussen's bidding problem: KQ653 --- Q62 AT542
- Let your partner know about your ♠s ASAP
See all comments
No followers yet
