Bridge Winners Profile for Patrick Gaudart

Sorry, this user has no cards yet.

How would you bid: I don't personally. The robot description was 7-10 Points 4+ Clubs.
How would you bid: At the time, I chose the first option: Bid 2♣, then pass 4♣. I did consider both doubling and raising to 5♣. Robot partner holds: QJ93 9 K96 Q8652
Why use Neuberg?: I have often wondered why a top is sometimes only worth 99% Now I know!
Muiderberg development doubt: Agreed
Muiderberg development doubt: If 2NT is game forcing, it seems like it may be right to switch around the responses so that after 2♥/2♠ - 2NT; 3♣/3♦ show maximums and 3♥/3♠ show minimums. Leaves more room when opener is maximum. That being said, I have ...
Your opinion about a very weak preempt: I would open 2D if I could and 3D if I couldn't.
I forgot. Is there any chance to recover?: The exact same auction happened to me in a recent event. Luckily opener held 3-5-3-2 and responder 3-3-4-3 so 4♥ played fine!
Patrick Gaudart's lead problem: 7652 AQ 86 Q9842: IIRC a spade lead did the trick. But this hand was nearly 7 months ago.
A triple Nott and a record?: I also played in this event. Over those 6 boards we didn't do quite as well as you... 79% (95, 50, 91, 100, 41, 95)
It's your bid: Out of interest, what would you do with 5-5 in the majors and stronger spades? E.g. AKQ83 AT964 63 3