Join Bridge Winners

Bridge Winners Profile for Paul Grünke

Paul Grünke
Paul Grünke
  • 34
    Following
  • 27
    Followers
  • 46
    Posts
  • 4
    Favorites

Basic Information

Member Since
April 10, 2012
Last Seen
2 hours ago
Member Type
Bridge Player
about me

Unfortunately an Ex-Junior by now.

Played in many international tournaments for Germany and won one European University Pairs Championship with Vemund Vikjord.

 

Bridge Information

ACBL Ranking
None
Sorry, this user has no cards yet.
Ruling question from Krakow
I guess it would be intersting to know what the correct explanation of the 6 bid was. If there was a missunderstanding this might be difficult to find out. As the bidding went, void in seems to be a reasonable explanation of the 6-bid. In that case ...
Paul Grünke's bidding problem: AKJT4 8764 85 92
If opener continues with 4, how often will partner bid 4 here and be wrong?
Paul Grünke's bidding problem: A9 AJ72 K652 852
This seems to be a real borderline hand. Does vulnerability matter here? Would you rather bid nonvuln vs nonvuln?
When Computers Deal Like We Used To
I thought leading the King from AK, if you have singleton in a side suit would be considered standard. Leading clubs seems fine, but I would therefore choose the K to avoid disambuigty about the holding.
Paul Grünke's bidding problem: K83 5 QJ7 AQT975
Which opener hands should bid 4 on this auction?
Paul Grünke's lead problem: K9 KT53 854 QJ42
Partner will almost always have four hearts, sometimes 5. I would have bid 4, if RHO had passed, but I thought that, 3 X would on on average result in a better MP score. With the opponents bidding to the 3-level with what seems to be 16 points ...
Paul Grünke's lead problem: K9 KT53 854 QJ42
The first double was takeout, the second one just showed points.
Dahl and Oshlag Lead Silodor Pairs
You are right. But so is the article.
To tank or not to tank
Action double would make sense here if 2 would be non-forcing, constructive. With the 2-bidder not being limited in any way, an action double does not work and and I think 4X should be the contract.
Lauritz Streck's bidding problem: QJT 8643 75 9753
Partner might have some extra offence and double. Then I would bid 5.
.

Bottom Home Top