Join Bridge Winners

Bridge Winners Profile for Philip McPeek

Philip McPeek
Philip McPeek
  • 70
  • 9
  • 4
  • 0

Basic Information

Member Since
April 25, 2016
Last Seen
4 hours ago
Member Type
bridge player

Bridge Information

ACBL Ranking
Sorry, this user has no cards yet.
Montreal Relay with 0 Clubs?
Stiff A/K/Q and otherwise balanced (i.e. meeting the definition of 'natural notrump') would be legal for basic/b+ but shorter would be illegal. As Ed points out above, ACBL alert procedures govern the announcement and the prescribed announcement is 'may be short.' However, if the bid is ...
Name this squeeze
Gold Rush
Any number of current competitive video games have sidestepped this issue ('the black box algorithm says...') by avoiding publicizing a specific numerical rating but instead lumping players into named rankings (e.g. bronze II, silver III, elite 4...). Sure, 'bronze' is arguably a euphemism for 'below average,' but even above ...
Open+ Chart opens up new bridge territory
To be fair, most things are most useful vs. the guppies
Open+ Chart opens up new bridge territory
That's definitely the site I found it from, though its been some years since I've seen it. I don't like a conventional double vs. SC as it delivers a semi-positive XX (or transfer or what not... i.e. extra space) to the opposition with little trade off.
Open+ Chart opens up new bridge territory
1NT any single suiter comes from a strong club defense called HUNT I found online some years ago. It's basically DONT but notrump bids replace the double.
1NT rebid showing 13-15 balanced
No alert required in ACBLland; alert procedures only require alerting a 1n rebid which could contain 16+.
Director Ruling
If the alert/explanation was an accurate description of their agreement then the ruling is correct. The opponents are allowed to misbid.
Philip McPeek's lead problem: KT T964 JT82 873
Not sure what happened. Fixed
Kyle Rockoff's bidding problem: 4 AKJ85 AK74 875
But it meets the definition of your 1 opener

Bottom Home Top