Join Bridge Winners

Bridge Winners Profile for Philip McPeek

Philip McPeek
Philip McPeek
  • 75
  • 11
  • 14
  • 0

Basic Information

Member Since
April 25, 2016
Last Seen
23 hours ago
Member Type
bridge player

Bridge Information

ACBL Ranking
Sorry, this user has no cards yet.
Which ACBL regional Nov 4-10?
The unit was both unable to find a site for the (formerly Lake Geneva) fall regional and lost its site for their summer regional; the board voted to 'upgrade' the Schaumburg sectional into a regional (instead of having no regional for the year). Should be back to our regularly scheduled ...
Reviving old questions.
Where's "discussed it and still don't agree?"
An Unusual Big Club System
Miles' Unbalanced Diamond is worth a perusal; Pete Matthews has a summary (should be near the top if you google 'unbalanced diamond' -- site hosted by MIT).
Book advice sought
Frank Stewart has "Who has the Queen?" though I've not actually read it myself.
Lose the Trials Semifinal with Me
Lot of clubs on 8, but 11 puts 8 to shame.
Book advice sought
Countdown to Winning Bridge is Bourke/Smith's primer on counting (1999, MPP).
Tough bidding challenge for BOTH partners
It's not going to go 1D all pass. Someone at the table has spades. Two-suited hands are difficult to bid by opening 2C, so even very good hands should tend to open at the 1-level in a standard structure.
Tough bidding challenge for BOTH partners
I voted for the third option. Not sure why, but I did.
Montreal Relay with 0 Clubs?
Stiff A/K/Q and otherwise balanced (i.e. meeting the definition of 'natural notrump') would be legal for basic/b+ but shorter would be illegal. As Ed points out above, ACBL alert procedures govern the announcement and the prescribed announcement is 'may be short.' However, if the bid is ...
Name this squeeze

Bottom Home Top