Join Bridge Winners

Bridge Winners Profile for Sarik Goyal

Sarik Goyal
Sarik Goyal
  • 72
    Following
  • 9
    Followers
  • 24
    Posts
  • 0
    Favorites

Basic Information

Member Since
May 20, 2018
Last Seen
39 minutes ago
Member Type
Bridge Player
about me

Northwestern University Class of 2021, USBF Junior

Bridge Information

Regular Bridge Partners
Kyle Rockoff, Daniel Weiss
Member of Bridge Club(s)
Northwestern DBC (owner)
BBO Username
rick853
ACBL Ranking
Non Life Master
Sorry, this user has no cards yet.
Ruling
Is it not AI for South to know that he/she is unsure of his/her own agreements?
Peg Kaplan's bidding problem: Txxxx --- 9xxxx xxx
When partner opens 1M and you have a void, I believe there is about a 90% chance that partner has a 6 card or longer suit using a multinomial approximation. While the two opps passes slightly lowers this probability, I still would expect partner to rebid some number of hearts ...
Peg Kaplan's bidding problem: Txxxx --- 9xxxx xxx
Michael and John, you are correct. I did indeed distribute 8 hearts among 34 vacant spaces. The true probability is 44.6%. However, I still feel that pass is better. With suits breaking badly, I'm more than happy defending on this hand. I also think there is a better ...
Revoke established or not?
A literal interpretation of the OP implies that declarer led a card out of turn following the failure to follow suit, hence no revoke.
Restricted Choice - or not?
If we assume that West will always play her lowest spot, then the finesse and the drop are equally likely to succeed. If West will play a random spot, the fact that we have not yet seen her play the 9 is a restricted choice situation in itself, making the ...
Easy ATB, but how should the auction have gone?
I'd be too worried about partner leaving in the X
Sarik Goyal's bidding problem: 765 --- QJT9876 T63
3 would be a weak jump shift.
Sarik Goyal's bidding problem: --- 9874 5432 J9765
Our agreements over the double are: 3 is a mixed raise (7-9 with 4+ card support), 2 is either 6-10 with 3 card support or <7 with 4+ card support. 4 would have been preemptive -- a legitimate option on the deal. On the actual hand, we end ...
Sarik Goyal's bidding problem: --- 9874 5432 J9765
While it's not for everyone, I think 2 is justifiable, for in addition to mildly preempting the opps out of their spade fit, the void gives the hand 1-2 tricks in value (which is more than raising with 3 queens/ 6 hcps). The questions I am interested in ...
.

Bottom Home Top