Bridge Winners Profile for Sebastian Kristensen
Basic Information
- Member Since
- Sept. 22, 2017
- Last Seen
- 2 hours ago
- Member Type
- Bridge Player
- about me
I played bridge professionally between 2001 and 2007. I took a break for some years but for the past 3 years I have played bridge seriously again (mostly on BBO but I will now start to play live tournaments again).
Bridge Information
- Favorite Bridge Memory
- The moment I realized that bridge is so deep and exciting that I can spend the rest of my life playing it and still be learning and excited about it.
- Bridge Accomplishments
- Best played hand of the year 2001
- Member of Bridge Club(s)
- Young Chelsea, London
- BBO Username
- silversc
- ACBL Ranking
- None
Sorry, this user has no cards yet.
- Merijn Groenenboom's bidding problem: KT2 KQ63 AQT52 Q
- 5S which ask partner to bid 5NT which I will pass.
- Merijn Groenenboom's bidding problem: KT2 KQ63 AQT52 Q
- I intend to bid 6NT if I get a 3 ace responds to 4NT.
- Sebastian Kristensen's bidding problem: J985 QJ8 J875 AJ
- SPOILER ALERT. Partner held A10xx, void, KQxxxx, 10xx. 4H makes, 4S is -1, 5D is -2. In theory declarer in 4H has to guess who has Ax club but in practice he should not be able to get it wrong once partner shows up with A of spades and KQ ...
- Sebastian Kristensen's bidding problem: 54 J962 AK842 62
- SPOILER ALERT Partner held K10xx, AKx, void, KQ109xx. 2NT was the limit so pass was the winner this time.
- Sebastian Kristensen's bidding problem: 83 QT87 AKJT83 K
- SPOILER ALERT Partner had 109xx, xx, qx, aj109x so x was right this time (I bid 2D at the table and partner was not amused when he put down dummy in 2D). I told him to close his eyes when the club lead went to my k.
- Sebastian Kristensen's lead problem: QJ63 7532 J7 T97
- SPOILER ALERT Any spade lead was right on this hand to keep declarer to 9 tricks instead of 11. Partner had a109xx.
- Sebastian Kristensen's bidding problem: 83 QT87 AKJT83 K
- We play multi landy over 1NT so the other choices would have been pass or 3d. I preferred a double based on the playing strength of the hand rather than a 3d bid which could be made on a much weaker hand. Opponents were vulnerable so if my double would ...
- Sebastian Kristensen's bidding problem: 83 QT87 AKJT83 K
- Partner could have either a weak hand or a penalty of 2C. Sorry I meant to put this as a reply on above post.
- Sebastian Kristensen's bidding problem: 83 QT87 AKJT83 K
- Partner could have either a weak hand or a penalty of 2C.
- Sebastian Kristensen's bidding problem: 83 QT87 AKJT83 K
- Bidding directly over 2C would show some values. With weak hands you would pass 2C first.
See all comments
