Bridge Winners Profile for Steve Kitching
Basic Information
- Member Since
- Sept. 23, 2015
- Last Seen
- Feb. 13
- Member Type
- bridge player
Bridge Information
- ACBL Ranking
- None
Sorry, this user has no cards yet.
- Dealing with Fair Disclosure when a tad grey
- We are an established pair but rarely splinter and as there was no formal agreement and it hadn’t happened before I was hoping partner would use his bridge knowledge to treat is as a 4th suit forcing.
- Dealing with Fair Disclosure when a tad grey
- Yes 2♠ would be forcing hence I feel that 3♠ had to be an asking bid of some sort. So if partner bids 3NT he has a spade stop so I’d be happy to pass, if he bids 4♦ I bid 6♦.
- How do you rule on this sitiuation
- Thank you David for your contribution and if you don't mind will share this with our directors as how to handle this situation in a mature way, as you might guess all the posted arguments came to light in the bridge room afterwards but someone did postulate this was ...
- How do you rule on this sitiuation
- Calling South poor for not bidding a contract that after seeing all 4 hands seems easy when also knowing there is a complete fubar going on that might have 4 or more Spade losers and another ♥ or ♦. They also didn't want to stress out East who was ...
- How do you rule on this sitiuation
- We discussed this to death, give North a void in ♦ and either E or W Jxxx in Diamonds and 3NT is 4 off potentially or the exposure in ♠s as well? If the ♦ bid was based on a 4333 hand with Diamonds and not a transfer then South ...
- How do you rule on this sitiuation
- No it would be natural if 2♦ was a transfer
- How do you rule on this sitiuation
- East also said to the directors it was their agreement at the end of the session but was panicked by their earlier error
- How do you rule on this sitiuation
- 3♦ would be a cuebid consistently in the NS system agreeing ♥s
- How do you rule on this sitiuation
- The directors had this very discussion but assuming South is stupid what they do as 3♦ is a cue bid if 2♦ is natural and ♦ is natural if 2♦ is a transfer AND what would be considered a SEWOG move (3NT?)? To be beyond stupid there ...
- How do you rule on this sitiuation
- West asserted it to the directors that it was categorically their agreement, EW were exemplary in their honesty
See all comments
No followers yet
Not following anyone yet