Bridge Winners Profile for Tomaz Adamic
Basic Information
- Member Since
- Aug. 21, 2013
- Last Seen
- 12 hours ago
- Member Type
- Bridge Player
- Country
- Slovenia
Bridge Information
- BBO Username
- Lakotnik
- ACBL Ranking
- None
Sorry, this user has no cards yet.
- Spiral Raises
- http://bridgewinners.com/article/view/dutch-spiral/
- Crunch Time
- Apologies if I missed such iniciative, but does this situation not call for the pro community, to organise in some kind of an union? Then you could give guidelines to all others and those guidelines could not be ignored by event organizers. As for Sabine's stand point - I think ...
- Jim Priebe's bidding problem: 53 KJT74 KQ6 KT9
- I prefer 3♦ instead of 2♦. We play it as 4+ card fit, 9+ pts.
- Tomaz Adamic's bidding problem: KQx xxxx KJxx Kx
- We both passed for +50 and 8%
- T-Walsh: 1!C-1!S-2!D uncontested
- We play T-Walsh and have accepted the fact, that we often can't find optimal diamond part score contract. It is a negative side of the system. We would bid 1NT with 1st hand and 2♣ with the 2nd.
- Value of Support Doubles?
- We play supp X/XX, but not compulsory. We follow these rules: Supp X/XX apply when the opening bid was 1 level, responder bids 1M, RHO bids below 2M. Even if these conditions are met, opener does NOT bid supp X/XX if: - RHO bid 1NT - another bid by ...
- Best defense against Big Club?
- Tom, what are advancers bids after 1c-x and 1c-1d ?
- Mikael Rimstedt's bidding problem: A8 AQT9752 6 K74
- Any agreement on "pass" and "rdbl" instead of 2♠?
- Can someone suggest how to run a team game with six pairs?
- If interested, I can email an excel file for 6 pairs, 5 rounds, 6 boards per round, each playing against all, Cross IMP results calculated ...
- Cover or not ?
- Yeah, sorry, chose the wrong poll format :-(
See all comments
