Bridge Winners Profile for Tomaz Adamic
Basic Information
- Member Since
- Aug. 21, 2013
- Last Seen
- 18 hours ago
- Member Type
- Bridge Player
- Country
- Slovenia
Bridge Information
- BBO Username
- Lakotnik
- ACBL Ranking
- None
Sorry, this user has no cards yet.
- 1H-1NT = 5+ spades (Kaplan Interchange)
- after 1♥ - 1NT 2♣ = Gazzilli 2♦ = natural 2♥ = 6+♥, 14-16 (we open 2M 10-13) 2♠ = 3+♠, 11-13 2NT = 3+♠,17+ 3m = 5♥5m, 14-16 ➤ 3M = NF; 4m = fit, GF; 3NT/4M = TP; other = M fit, cue 3♠ = 3+♠, 14-16 4♣♦ = splinter Let me know if you are interested for more ...
- 1C (1H) X = 4+spades
- We play "system on" after 1♣ - (1♦/♥), except for dbl, which is transfer. In our system 1NT would show 14-16 balanced with lack of a M stopper or GF hand with clubs
- Selena Pepić's bidding problem: T AQJ4 AKQ KJ865
- It depends on the agreement how aggressive 2♠ can be in this situation ...
- What does 3!S mean?
- Could pass over 2♦ not have been a "trap pass" ?
- Migrating to 1NT semi forcing
- http://freeweb.t-2.net/Oneoff/n2c.html
- Emanuel Evacic's bidding problem: KJT62 73 K9 AKJ7
- We play, that double here only shows 2 diamonds at most ...
- Good Three Card Spade Raise After 1!H Opening When Playing Gazzilli
- We play Gazzilli in combination with Kaplan Interchange.
- Spiral Raises
- http://bridgewinners.com/article/view/dutch-spiral/
- Crunch Time
- Apologies if I missed such iniciative, but does this situation not call for the pro community, to organise in some kind of an union? Then you could give guidelines to all others and those guidelines could not be ignored by event organizers. As for Sabine's stand point - I think ...
- Jim Priebe's bidding problem: 53 KJT74 KQ6 KT9
- I prefer 3♦ instead of 2♦. We play it as 4+ card fit, 9+ pts.
See all comments
