Join Bridge Winners

Bridge Winners Profile for Ulf Nilsson

Ulf Nilsson
Ulf Nilsson
  • 123
    Following
  • 82
    Followers
  • 85
    Posts
  • 24
    Favorites

Basic Information

Member Since
June 23, 2010
Last Seen
7 minutes ago
Member Type
Bridge Pro
about me

Ulf Nilsson

Bridge Information

BBO Username
ulven
ACBL Ranking
None
Sorry, this user has no cards yet.
Rohit Gupta's bidding problem: JT75 --- AKQJ5 AKJ5
I would have bid 3 previous round.
Sarik Goyal's bidding problem: AQ642 --- AJ75 AKQ9
I'd rather give up the game than pass here...
Nikolas Bausback's bidding problem: KJT Q853 AQ4 AQ9
The argument for doubling isn't that I want to defend 1NT and hope to beat it a bunch. It's that we hope partner has some shape (5+ suit) and bids at the 2-level. I'm willing to bet that someone bids (in imps).
Russell Samuel's bidding problem: AKx AJ8xxx QT xx
I think it's best to play 3 as nonforcing, we must be able to get our suits in there when everybody is bidding.
Ulf Nilsson's bidding problem: Q2 87 KQJ7 AQJ42
This is from Wuhan, partner with KJ8764/AK5/A82/9 had a problem over 3 and some missed 6. 10 Tables in 6, 5 in 3NT, 9 in 4, 1 accident 7 X-1.
Ulf Nilsson's bidding problem: Q2 87 KQJ7 AQJ42
I think 2 should show 6 over 2 but that looks like a minority view.
Simon Weinberger's bidding problem: Q8 752 KT654 965
2 for the lead?
Any books on Moscito?
Nigel Dutton published a book around 2000. Don't know if still available somewhere.
Ulf Nilsson's bidding problem: 8 A75 AKQ86 JT43
Eric, I don't understand your reference to "diplomatic immunity". I don't need to make any arguments because this isn't a debate and I don't care. You can have the "win" :-)
Ulf Nilsson's bidding problem: 8 A75 AKQ86 JT43
I am curious why everyone (ok, might be an exaggeration) attribute so much value to passed/unpassed status. It's true that certain shapely hands are no longer possible when partner didn't open a weak 2 or a preemptive 3 (etc) here but when it comes to ...
.

Bottom Home Top